For 1st time, a high court rules against nuclear plant operations

Submitted by Asahi Shimbun on
Translation Approval
Off
Media Type
Layer Type
Archive
Asahi Asia & Japan Watch
Latitude
0
Longitude
0
Location
0,0
Media Creator Username
KEI KOBAYASHI
Media Creator Realname
KEI KOBAYASHI
Frequency
Archive Once
Scope
One Page
Internet Archive Status
Not Submitted
Media Date Create
Retweet
Off
English Title
For 1st time, a high court rules against nuclear plant operations
English Description

HIROSHIMA--A high court for the first time has banned operations at a nuclear power plant.

The Hiroshima High Court issued the injunction in a verdict Dec. 13 that applies to the No. 3 reactor at the Ikata nuclear power plant in Ikata, Ehime Prefecture, operated by Shikoku Electric Power Co.

The company suspended operations in October to carry out a periodic inspection. If a judicial decision overturning the Dec. 13 high court ruling is not issued, the Ikata reactor will not be able to resume operations--even if the inspection is completed without problems.

For that reason, the latest ruling could affect the government's plans to resume operations at other nuclear plants more than six years after the triple meltdown at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant.

An official with Shikoku Electric Power labeled the court injunction as "extremely regrettable" and lamented the fact that it did not accept the company's assertion that the plant is safe.

"The verdict is unacceptable," the official said.

The utility plans to initiate procedures immediately to have the injunction suspended.

The injunction request was made by four residents of Hiroshima and Matsuyama cities. Among the main points of contention before the high court were the rationality of new safety standards approved by the Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) in the aftermath of the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster; the rationality behind the expected maximum strength of an earthquake for the area; and an evaluation of the effect of volcanic ash on the reactor's operations.

In a March 2017 ruling, the Hiroshima District Court said there was nothing irrational about the new safety standards and also concluded there were no irrational points in the NRA decision that the plant met new safety standards related to the effects of quakes and volcanic ash.

The district court rejected the request by the plaintiffs who argued there was a danger of an accident occurring caused by the insufficient safety at the Ikata plant.

While district courts have issued injunctions on operations at other plants, higher courts have overturned all those verdicts until now.

For example, the Fukui District Court in April 2015 and the Otsu District Court in March 2016 ordered operations stopped at the No. 3 and No. 4 reactors of the Takahama nuclear power plant in Fukui Prefecture operated by Kansai Electric Power Co., but those verdicts were later overturned.

ID at Source
AJ201712130050
Flagged for Internet Archive
Off
URI
http://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/AJ201712130050.html
Attribution URI
http://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/AJ201712130050.html
Thumbnail URL
https://s3.amazonaws.com/jda-drupal/AS20171213003717_comm.jpg